ANALISIS INSTITUCIONAL LOURAU PDF
Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||18 July 2004|
|PDF File Size:||7.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.28 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Criticizing would be to try to adjust a way to understand and act from certain ideas adopted as references and, in that sense, would have institucoinal be adopted by others.
A writing that provokes movements and recomposes the scene reported through collective analyses makes us think that: Lourua between the analysis and the criticism.
By weaving practices and our look at them, that is, how we construct reality, an interrogation emerges to be worked out by shifting our experience of the patterns of truth and by opening ourselves to recognizing multiple prisms to deal with relationships. Xnalisis this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary.
Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Faced with a grandmother who arrives at the council complaining that the child’s mother is negligent, the counselor, without any consultation with the mother for being taken by the urgency that the report provokes, issues responsibility for this grandmother. Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political.
An instrument to operate in practice and not a technical manual to carry in the bag, hoping it contains the right answers. Education without a previous shape? Analyzing our implications is a way of thinking of ourselves as the producers of relationships, in opposition to the movement that understands them as data from which we have to adjust.
The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities. Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains the practices read by our gaze, before judging their truth or qualifying the agreements.
Objectivity as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned analisks front of a record of something distant, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act.
The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done. Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism The field diary is a technical instrument lourxu produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
It is not a mechanical exercise, a factual record, but the construction of a look that does not precede the writing, involving itself in it, evidencing everything that moves it.
The protagonism of the author of the diary is in the conduct of something that may have been understood as a particular situation, an action of a professional or a team, but it becomes a social event and historically referenced, even when loaded with singularities, because it was the analysis of their own implications.
Coercion establishes a nexus between moral thinking and the penal meaning that leads to judgment. In Durkheim’s words, “Every way of doing is a social fact, whether fixed or not, which can exert an external coercion on the individual, or which is general in the set of a given society having at the same time an own existence, independent of its individual manifestations”p.
Therefore, it is possible to say that the writing of the diary is the analytical reading of practice, since writing allows events, which could be ignored, to take shape and have a meaning for the analysis.
In addition to being an authorial practice, the field diary is responsible for relationships because it produces events, by highlighting – with its densities and forms – what is recorded. Unlike the concept of “social fact” proposed by Durkheim, who grounds the positivist method, the field diary proposed by institutional analysis and in the light of Michel Analisus concept of event does not attribute any value to any episode, act and situation.
Its wealth is not in teaching to do right or better, since analissis performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance. Foucault understands truth as a relation of power, differing from the act of looking at truth as something to be discovered and accepted, insofar as truth responds to a set of rules and procedures, which produce discourses.
Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, by feeling, by silence, by desire, and any element can participate. The implication paradigm allows us to show the different forces present in the field of actuation, instrumentalizing the analysis of the place occupied by the specialist and, snalisis this way, questions the verticalities of the logic that separates the subject that intervenes from the object of the intervention.
The urgent character that characterizes the work of many establishments, given by rushed routines and the lack of conditions for more careful procedures, contrasts with the practice of thinking provoked by the writing of the field diary. This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as instituxional basis: It never precedes our gaze, because it is the effect of it.
A creative dimension leads the diary and that, just before giving security, can scare. The process necessary to deconstruct the prisons of the instituted is long, demanding from us the reinvention through practices of intervention to think what is ahalisis and naturalized in the world. For this reason, Lourau affirms that the field diary in a socioanalytic intervention is not an intimate exercise, but a collective movement – less by the fingers that write the text and more by the ideas that compose it.
The analysis is done to understand how the fact was produced and why, as a universal reality, to coerce those who are submitted to it.
In this way, instiucional shows that in the midst of the truths considered absolute – the instituted – there are gaps, experiments that are not yet palpable, which causes instituiconal Thereby, to institutionalize is to compose discipline, to affirm essences. These are regularities that escape the evolutionist perspective, articulating “the discontinuity of regularities, the chance of their transformations, the materiality of their conditions of existence” p.
The lived experience that composes the writing does not necessarily match the one that occurred originally, because the thinking and feeling in the moment in which a record is constructed allows to resign, in an analytical compass in which the author is not alone, but in a shared movement with all those who composed the scene and in the midst of their thoughts, feelings, values, conceptions, also put into question.
For example, intervening in a tutelary council implies thinking about the actions that take place in the encounter with the different forces, relationships and beliefs that build this territory. For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Interrogations are the right tool institucioanl a field diary, the good company in a formation by keeping alive the thinking and the research as professional practices that do not exhaust and do not analisiss to make learning.
The writing of the diary allows surprises, insurgencies and invites not to write about reality but to interrogate it. Next, the mother comes to inshitucional board demanding the child institcuional.
Thus, when intervening in the tutelary council it is necessary to think of it as an institution that has a history and movements that escape the boundaries of the place and the space-time condition of the establishment. It puts on the scene everything and everyone who in writing emerges as participants, summoning them to contribute to the analysis through their speeches, practices or the bonds that the problematizations create.
Rene Lourau (Author of مفاتيح علم الاجتماع)
Not that the will to domination is exhausted by working under the logic of the event, but it breaks the chains of a fact that is always objective, external, alien to the will of the people: It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings.
Como citar este artigo. In their speech “they do not know the history of people and they take any story as true”. For the latter, every act-fact is always reality in movement, being made and embodied by the analysis. The contents of the field diary could never be defined a priorinor could a schema or guideline be established, since this would be a pretension to guide the way of seeing, feeling, thinking, affecting, to signify the relationships at stake.
What sustains a record of the social fact is its objectivity. Even an act conducted personally is crossed by norms, affections, conditions, circumstances that take the professional practice off the heroic scene. In this abyss the diary projects us when converted into an apprenticeship committed to thinking and feeling.
These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary. An loursu tool for carrying out the implication analysis is the field diary, which operates as a narrative of day-to-day intervention, historicizing it, rescuing it, potentializing it, in other words, enabling analysis by the act of writing.
What sustains a field diary that operates by analysis implication is the debate about the production of truth.